Internet Regulation after WikiLeaks

At a meeting in New York on Wednesday, representatives from Brazil called for an international body made up of Government representatives that would attempt to create global standards for policing the internet - specifically in reaction to challenges such as WikiLeaks.

IT News for Australian Business

Homeland Security Approval for Private Sector Jobs

Construction workers in New York will need permission from the TSA and DHS in order to practice their profession and earn a living. It was much the same in the former Soviet Union and authoritarian states such as China where the government determines all aspects of an individual’s life and where even the mildly rebellious are severely punished.

Prison Planet

Mercury in Dental Fillings

"I always wondered why we were told by the (American Dental Association) to be careful when disposing of mercury. If it's so dangerous to the environment, why not my patients?" asked Dr. Stephen Markus, a dentist in the Philadelphia area.

CNN Health

Global Warming Irony

Chilly Global Warming Summit

Wal-Mart

Here is the Wal-Mart video on its own, uploaded by ushomelandsecurity with the description "This public service announcement will air in all Walmart stores equipped with checkout screens.":



Reminds me of this from the UK.

This is playing in the Mall of America:



Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

--Ben Franklin

"Do Not Discuss WikiLeaks"

EDIT: I was going to insert a link to WikiLeaks, but wikileaks.org does not seem to work anymore. Is WikiLeaks gone?

Columbia University students were told that if they were seeking a job with the federal government they SHOULD NOT post links to WikiLeaks online or even discuss it on social networking sites.

"[The State Department official] recommends that you DO NOT post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter," the Office of Career Services advised students. "Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government."

Here is the email:

From: Office of Career Services
Date: Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:26 PM
Subject: Wikileaks - Advice from an alum
To: "Office of Career Services (OCS)"


Hi students,

We received a call today from a SIPA alumnus who is working at the State Department. He asked us to pass along the following information to anyone who will be applying for jobs in the federal government, since all would require a background investigation and in some instances a security clearance.

The documents released during the past few months through Wikileaks are still considered classified documents. He recommends that you DO NOT post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter. Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government.

Regards,
Office of Career Services

I got this information from this Huffington Post article.

Climate Change Program 2009-2012, Mexico

After reading the Executive Summary of this "Special Climate Change Program 2009-2012 Mexico" that is taking place November 29th to December 10th here, here are some excerpts:

"Tackling climate change requires the immediate development of activities that reduce greenhouse gas emissions... The effectiveness of these activities increases significantly when various sectors converge in a cross-cutting mainstream policy strategy."

So we are supposed to want a mainstream, cross-cutting policy strategy... I bet a one-world policy is ideal. And the policy is supposed to reduce greenhouse gases.

"Recently, several groups of experts in the scientific, economic, and social aspects of climate change have raised the possibility that the risks posed are significantly more severe than outlined in previous estimates, such that current mitigation strategies are likely to need updating in the short term."

So climate change is bad, and we need to do something about it soon.

"Mexico's aspirational target," the target of lower greenhouse gas emissions, "will only be met if a multilateral regime," or an authoritarian government consisting of governments from various countries, aka a one world government, "is established which includes financial and technological support mechanisms from developed countries on an unprecedented scale."

So countries have to come together and form a one-world government in a new world order in order to lower their respective greenhouse gas emissions.

"The mitigation effort that Mexico intends to develop requires deep transformations in production and consumption patterns, energy use, natural resource management, and in the ways that land is occupied and used."

These sound like extreme changes. The only condition in which these changes should be made is if climate change is proven beyond any doubt. This is not the case.

"Strengthening strategic, large-scale adaption capacities from 2013 to 2030, includes as priorities... The implementation of relocation programs for human settlements and infrastructure in high risk areas."

So they plan on forcing people to relocate. The climate change fraud could lead to complete control over us.

John Tyner Interview

A must-watch interview with John Tyner by Alex Jones about the TSA "groin check" incident:

The Transportation Security Administration

Watch this full video, and get a better understanding of just how few rights we have at the airport now. John Tyner refuses to get a "groin check" in which, in the TSA agent's own words, the agent places a hand on your hip and a hand on your inner thigh, slowly goes up, and slides down... Twice in the front and twice in the back. Tyner refuses, chooses to leave the airport, but he is even prevented in doing that.

Would you allow yourself to be molested like this?

"Real Men Want Globocops"

Here is a great article from The New American about rallying support for an unconstitutional war, while stifling any dissent. The article also mentions how "prestigious" Catholic colleges are teaching atheism. Here is a quote from it:

So a good American is one who risks or loses his life or limbs defeating the conquest and occupation of Kuwait by Iraq so he can come home and pay college professors to conquer the faith of his children and occupy their minds for some godless philosophy of hedonism or nihilism.

Read it here.

Albert Einsetin on the Existence of Evil

Hinduism (part 1)

I own the "Bhagavad Gita", one of the most important Hindu texts. The version I have contains the text from the Gita, followed by a "purport" explaining the text. Looking through it and other books about the religion, I can see why the elite are trying to push it on us so much.

Hinduism is the perfect New World Order religion. I realize this is a bold statement, and I plan on explaining it.

Quotes from the Bhagavad Gita are in bold, and the purports are in italics. My words are in normal font.

In the beginning of the Gita Krsna (or Krishna), an avatar (which is God coming to Earth in human form to interact with humankind for specific purposes of his own), wants a man named Arjuna to take part in a battle. Arjuna realizes that he is about to go to battle against some of his family members and good friends, so he no longer wants to go to war. Krsna, the avatar, explains why fighting and killing is ok sometimes.

I do not see how any good can come from killing my own kinsman in this battle, nor can I, my dear Krsna, desire any subsequent victory, kingdom or happiness.

PURPORT: Without knowing that one's self interest is in Visnu (or Avatars), conditioned souls are attracted by bodily relationships, hoping to be happy in such situations. In such a blind conception of life, they forget even the causes of material happiness. Arjuna thinks that by killing his kinsman there would be no happiness in his life, and therefore he is not willing to fight.

So, if someone is considered an avatar, we should do exactly what they say, and ignore our family, because believing in family is a "blind conception of life".

O son of Prtha, do not yield to this degrading impotence. It does not become you. Give up such petty weakness of heart and arise, O chastiser of the enemy.

PURPORT: Arjuna was addressed as the son of Prtha, who happened to be sister of Krsna's father Vasudeva. Therefore Arjuna had a blood relationship with Krsna. If the son of a ksatriya declines to fight, he is a ksatriya in name only, and if the son of a brahmana acts impiously, he is a brahmana in name only. Such ksatriyas and brahmanas are unworthy sons of their fathers; therefore, Krsna did not want Arjuna to become an unworthy son of a ksatriya.

Arjuna said: O killer of enemies, O killer of Madhu, how can I counterattack with arrows in battle men like Bhisma and Drona, who are worthy of my worship?

PURPORT: Respectable superiors like Bhisma the grandfather and Drona the teacher are always worshipable. Even if they attack, they should not be counterattacked. It is genreal etiquette that superiors are not to be offered even a verbal fight. Even if they are sometimes harsh in behavior, they should not be harshly treated.

So don't just simply respect superiors, but WORSHIP them. In other words, always listen to George Bush, Barack Obama, Dick Cheney, etc., and don't argue with them.

The material body of the indestructible, immeasurable, and eternal living entity is sure to come to an end; therefore fight, O descendant of Bharta.

PURPORT: The material body is perishable by nature. It may perish immediately, or it may do so after a hundred years. There is no chance of maintaining it indefinitely. But the spirit soul is so minute that it can not even be seen by an enemy, to say nothing of being killed. So from both viewpoints there is no cause of lamentation, because the living entity as he is cannot be killed nor can the material body be saved for any length of time or permanently protected. Arjuna was advised to fight and not sacrifice the cause of religion for material, bodily considerations.

I bet killing millions in Iraq feels a lot better if you're a Hindu. I bet staging 9/11 feels a lot better, too.

Neither he who thinks the living entity the slayer nor he who thinks it slain is in knowledge, for the self slays not nor is slain.

PURPORT: When an embodied living entity is hurt by fatal weapons, it is to be known that the living entity within the body is not killed. The living entity is not killable, because of his spiritual constitution. What is killed, or is supposed to be killed, is the body only. This, however, does not at all encourage killing of the body. Killing the body of anyone without authority is abominable and is punishable by the law of the state as well as by the law of the Lord. Arjuna, however, is being engaged in killing for the principle of religion, and not whimsically.

So thou shalt not kill, unless you have authority to do so by a man claiming to be an avatar or by any "superior".

So far, I would love Hinduism if I was in power. More later.

The 10:10 Campaign

Here is some global warming propaganda for you. Cut your "carbon emissions" by ten percent, or you will be killed.

I am really disappointed that one of my favorite bands, Radiohead, contributed their song to this ad.



Here is their website, 1010global.org

Illuminati Symbolism in the Media

Illuminati symbolism is all over the media. A few examples:

An episode of Family Guy in which the all-seeing Eye of Horus appears:



An in-your-face MTV commercial (this one is painfully obvious... once again the Eye of Horus):



A Tom and Jerry episode with the Eye of Horus on top of a pyramid (like on the back of the one dollar bill) sitting behind two serpents (representing Satan as in the Bible). The Hollywood executives also worship an image of Satan, whom they call the "President of Hollywood":



Alex Jones talks about the symbolism in the movie Watchmen in the next four videos:









Jones shows a clip of the pilot episode of "The Lone Gunmen" that aired in March of 2001, in which a few members within the government intentionally fly a plane into the World Trade Center using remote control, in order to go to war to increase arms sales. This is the clip:

Letter of Resignation from APS

The London Telegraph has reported that Harold Lewis, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has resigned from the American Physical Society due to the false "science" of global warming. Here is his letter of resignation:



Sent: Friday, 08 October 2010 17:19 Hal Lewis

From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara
To: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society

6 October 2010

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago).

Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:

1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate

2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.

4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.

5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.

6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.

I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.

Hal


Anthony Watts describes it as "an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science."

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety
Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; Wrote two books: Technological Risk and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making).

Barry Jennings and World Trade Center 7

Barry Jennings was one of the witnesses to the explosions heard in World Trade Center 7 before it collapsed. Explosions would be used to weaken the building's structure before it is brought down in a controlled demolition.



Here is an interview he did for Loose Change, in which he says he heard explosions in the lobby of WTC 7 before either of the first two towers fell:



To further corroborate his account, here is a video of Robert Hess, the man who was stuck in tower 7 with Barry Jennings, yelling for help from the eighth floor:



Jennings passed away (causes unknown) just a few days before the NIST report of what happened to building 7 was released to the public.

Here is a very sad but interesting interview (about 32 minutes long) with Dylan Avery, director of Loose Change, on "Deadline Live" from April 16th, 2009, in which he discusses the interview with Barry Jennings and his mysterious death:

Dylan Avery Interview (mp3)

4/23/10 WTC 7 post

4/6/10 Ten 9/11 Truths post

3/9/10 Jesse Ventura and 9/11 Truth post

Mike Maloney on Economics

This is a really educational presentation on economics. Taking place at the 8th International Banking Forum in Sochi, Russia, watch as Mike Maloney discusses fiat currency (currency not backed by any commodity), and the looming collapse of the world economy, probably leading to a one-world currency and thus a one-world order.

Watch "Dollars and Sense" first if you haven't already, it is the easiest presentation on economics to follow.

John & Yoko on Overpopulation

This Thing of Darkness

Summer break is ending, and I plan on continuing this blog.

The following is an excerpt from This Thing of Darkness by Harry Thompson, on the theory of evolution:

" 'According to Mr. Darwin, transitional forms, precisely because they are transitional, are less likely to leave a fossil record than stabilized species. Is that not clever? The theory itself brilliantly explains why there is no evidence whatsoever to support the theory! There is only one adjective to describe such logic: unsatisfactory. Scientists have searched in vain for any shred of evidence, any shred of proof, that any one individual species might have varied, be it ever so little, into a different genus. One tiny variation that might validate the conclusion that such variability is progressive and unlimited, so as, in the course of generations, to change the species, the genus, the order and, eventually, the class. That proof has not been found-- and it never will be.

" 'There is no tendency on the part of the lower animals to become the self-conscious, intelligent being that is man. Mr. Darwin's conclusions are mere hypothesis, nothing more, raised most unphilosophically to the dignity of a casual theory! Is it really, truly credible that a turnip strives to become a man?'

"The rush of arguments in his head became a landslide, an avalanche, each irrefutable fact tumbling incoherently over the others. The inability of natural selection to account for the origin of life itself. The unsatisfactory reduction of the aesthetic, the emotional and the spiritual to mere epiphenomena. The falsity of Darwin's narrative, which had been constructed on foundations that were geologically poles apart. The failure of natural selection to explain the development of complex organs, such as the eye, and their coordination in bodily systems. The presence of advance creatures in the earliest strata of fossils, and of the most primitive creatures alive today.

"FitzRoy tried to tell them that he had been there with Darwin, that he had observed the same things, that Origin of the Species was not a logical arrangement of the facts that he had witnessed."

New Bilderberg Website

A brand new site for the Bilderberg meetings is up. Evidently, they are now acknowledging that they exist (watch the video here at about 7:15 to see Hillary Clinton acting as though she never even heard the word before) and are portraying it as a good thing for the world. Why keep it a secret for so long if it is good?

Prove all things; hold fast to that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)

bilderbergmeetings.org

Bilderberg 2010

The New World Order is as close as ever, and it'll be even closer after the next 3 days, as the international elites meet at the annual Bilderberg meeting. I will post more about Bilderberg in the future. The meeting takes place in Sitges, Spain this year, and begins tomorrow.

Read this blog over at the UK's Guardian website to get a feel for how important these Bilderberg meetings are. Also watch this video.



Here is a video of the security at Bilderberg from Russia Today:





I'm not sure who filmed this but it is more footage of the security there:



Spanish news coverage:





More coverage of Bilderberg at Prison Planet.

Overpopulation

I'll let other people do the talking in this post.


“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” --Henry Kissinger

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer." --Henry Kissinger

"Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries." --Henry Kissinger

“The elderly are useless eaters.” --Henry Kissinger

“World population needs to be decreased by 50%.” --Henry Kissinger

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.” --Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature” --Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones (mentioned in a previous post)

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent." --Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviet Union

“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind.” --Theodore Roosevelt

“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” --Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

Here's more Ted Turner, listen as he discusses the end of the world (according to him "in 30-40 years"), caused by global warming, which, according to him (and many other mega-wealthy), is caused by overpopulation:

For the record: these people make me sick.

Mankind is Awake

Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder (along with David Rockefeller) of the Trilateral Commission, gave a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations in which he stated the obstacles in the way of the New World Order. One being that the members of the G20 were not united due to its "much more diversified global leadership", and another being that:

"For the first time in all of human history, mankind is politically awakened. That's a total new reality. It has not been so for most of human history, until the last 100 years... and most people know what is generally going on, generally going on, in the world, and are consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation... This makes a much more difficult context for any major power, including, currently, the leading world power, the United States."



Stay awake.

The Federal Reserve and "Dollars and Sense"

I hadn't known much about the Federal Reserve until I watched "Dollars and Sense" by the John Birch Society. I had the pleasure of meeting John McManus, the President of the JBS, last month, and I can say with absolute certainty, that he, as well as the rest of the John Birch Society, is not the extremist the mainstream media wants you to believe.

I highly recommend watching these videos. McManus articulates his points very well, so "Dollars and Sense" is very easy to watch, and is never boring or confusing.











Here are some of the main points from the speech:

1. In many Americans' lifetimes, the country has gone from the greatest creditor on Earth with the most respected currency, to the greatest debtor with an increasingly shunned currency.

2. A silver dollar is worth at least 12 times more than a paper dollar, due to inflation.

3. Inflation is not rising prices. It is an increase in the amount of currency, resulting in rising prices.

4. John Maynard Keynes: "By a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly an unobserved, an important part of the wealth of citizens..."

5. The Federal Reserve, by inflation, is stealing from the poor and middle class, and giving to the rich.

6. Henry Hazlitt: "Inflation tears apart the whole fabric of stable economic relationships. It drives men toward desperate remedies. It leads men to demand totalitarian controls. It ends invariably in bitter disillusion and collapse."

7. Germany, after World War One, inflated the Reichsmark until it collapsed, all over the course of about three years. This caused much bitterness, and the man who was supposed to restore pride and bring Germany back to its feet was Adolf Hitler.

8. There are only 3 kinds of money: commodity (gold, silver); fiduciary (can be exchanged for commodity); and paper (not redeemable in commodity or fiduciary, made "legal tender" by government edict).

9. The U.S. had commodity and fiduciary money, but we are now using paper money.

10. The U.S. constitution on money: "Congress shall have the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standards of weights and measurements."

11. People took their gold and silver in to get it stamped into coins, a.k.a. "coining" money.

12. Congress did not have the power to establish a central bank, which is what the Federal Reserve is.

13. Again, the constitution: "No state shall coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver a tender in payment of debts."

14. The attitude of the founders on paper money? Oliver Ellsworth: "Shut and bar the door against paper money." James Wilson: "Remove the possibility of paper money." John Langdon: "I would reject the whole constitution [if paper money is not barred]."

15. The Federal Reserve was created in 1913. We were taken off the gold standard in 1933, and off the silver standard in 1968.

16. The Federal Reserve note used to say "redeemable in lawful money", until someone asked for lawful money in exchange for his notes, and none of the bankers knew what he was talking about. The note now says "This note is legal tender for all debts public and private." Redeemable in nothing.

17. Alan Greenspan, in the 1960s, was all for commodity money. He said in a 1967 book "In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect saving from confiscation through inflation." He joined the Council on Foreign Relations (the group running this country) in 1978, and became chairman of the Federal Reserve in 1987, in favor of paper money.

18. The Federal Reserve: an unelected few, appointed by the President for 14 year terms, have the unconstitutional power to decide the amount of currency, establish the value of the currency, set interest rates, and create booms and busts.

19. The Federal Reserve was the idea of Edward Mandell House, President Wilson's top advisor. He wrote in his own 1912 book that he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." He later founded the Council on Foreign Relations.

20. Mayer Amschel Rothschild: "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."

21. Wright Patman, 1968: "In the United States today, we have in effect two governments. We have the duly constituted government. Then we have an independent, uncontrolled, and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve."

22. The Communist Manifesto: "5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." The Fed, though, is not even in the hands of the state. Therefore we went a step further than communism itself in that regard.

Proofs of a Conspiracy (1798) and the Illuminati

I have been reading a really great book lately. It's called Proofs of a Conspiracy, by John Robison. It was written in 1798. It discusses the rise of the Illuminati, and the evil intentions of its creators.

The Illuminati could possibly be the leaders of today's world, the ones behind the New World Order, and therefore conceivably the enemies of Christianity. The Association formed based on the ideas of Free Masonry. Here is a quote from the book:

"I have observed these doctrines gradually diffusing and mixing with all the different systems of Free Masonry; till, at last, an Association has been formed for the express purpose of rooting out all the religious establishments, and overturning all the existing governments of Europe."

Here is another:

"And when we see that the methods which were practised by this Association for the express purpose of breaking all the bands of society, were employed solely in order that the leaders might rule the world with uncontrollable power, while all the rest, even of the associated, will be degraded in their own estimation, corrupted in their principles, and employed as mere tools of the ambition of their unknown superiors; surely a free-born Briton will not hesitate to reject at once, and without any farther examination, a plan so big with mischief, so disgraceful to its underlying adherents, and so uncertain in its issue."

"The Association of which I have been speaking, is the Order of Illuminati."

The founder of this Association, Adam Weishaupt, was a devious man, a twisted genius. He knew how to lure men into the Illuminati, and how to slowly twist their beliefs as they climbed the ladder of degrees, until they were atheists aggressively working toward a New World Order, thinking they would become leaders of the Order themselves. This system was created by Weishaupt and still continues today.

In Weishaupt's words:

"Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is concealed mystery."

He knew that by making the highest degrees of Illumination mysterious, as if they contained a massive secret that would change someone's entire life and way of thinking if they found out, men would drop everything they had in order to pursue them.

The creation of a "priest degree" by Weishaupt was used to lure in the religious, and eventually make them Deists, and finally Atheists.

The priest degree contained a "secret" about Christianity that had supposedly been passed down from the Knights Templars, to the Free Masons, to the Illuminati. The secret was that Jesus had used the popular religion of his time only as a means of portraying his Deist beliefs about Illumination. This fabrication was used to twist the Christians who entered into the Illuminati into believing that Jesus was not sent by God, and was simply a man who believed in Reason as the true God. This inevitably made Atheists out of the weak-minded Christians. Here is another quote by Weishaupt in a letter to another high-ranking member:

"You can't imagine what respect and curiosity my priest degree has raised; and, which is wonderful, a famous protestant divine, who is now of the Order, is persuaded that the religion contained in it is the true sense of Christianity. Oh man, man! To what may'st thou not be persuaded. Who would imagine that I was to be the founder of a new religion."

Satan's weakness is pride, which I believe is the reason Adam Weishaupt bragged in writing about his evil intentions (and why Nick Rockefeller bragged to Aaron Russo, who then attempted to warn the world of Rockefeller's plan in this interview, which I have posted before here and here).

And the reason you most likely have not heard of the Illuminati? As fellow conspirator Marquis Constanza said:

"Death, inevitable death, from which no potentate can protect them, awaits every traitor of the Order"

I will post much more about the Illuminati and their influence over television, books, and entertainment.

"He (Satan) was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." --John 8:44

M.I.A.'s Video and our Police State

M.I.A., a female electronic/hiphop musician from Sri Lanka, has a new album coming out in June. She doesn't seem to be shying away from controversy. The official video for the song "Born Free" off of the album was released today. It depicts the United States FBI or some other U.S. police force acting like Nazis and rounding up all red-headed boys (rather than Jewish people) and having them run through a mine field. Watch this video of the Allegheny County police using the "Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD)" for the first time in the U.S. at the G20 summit in Pittsburgh last year, then the video of Dr. Kevorkian I posted here, then M.I.A.'s video, then the video I posted here of the U.S. military in Iraq.



While red-heads are most likely not going to be the target group, the message in her video is strong. Think of the phrase "born free". Are we living free? Are we already a police state?

We're heading down a very dark path.

JFK and Secret Societies

This is a really good video starting with John F. Kennedy's speech on secret societies ruling the world, followed by clips of interviews about Skull and Bones at Yale, the Bilderbergs, Bohemian Grove, and the Council on Foreign Relations. I think this is a good starting point for people who want to know more about the New World Order.

The WTC 7 Demolition

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, a writer for FoxNews.com, published an article yesterday attempting to debunk 9/11 theories. However, his attempt failed massively as he admits that Larry Silverstein, the World Trade Center leaseholder, wanted WTC 7 taken down by controlled demolition. This is very, very serious. Here is an excerpt from the article:

Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.

A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy.

Why would Silverstein be looking for authorization of demolishing the tower, when there was supposedly no explosives placed on the building to do so? Did he expect workers to enter a burning building that had already been evacuated to accurately place demolition explosives on several different levels of the 47 story structure? Why would he be trying to demolish a building when controlled demolitions take weeks and sometimes months to organize?

Here is an excerpt on the step by step process of demolishing a building, from How Stuff Works:

In order to demolish a building safely, blasters must map out each element of the implosion ahead of time. The first step is to examine architectural blueprints of the building, if they can be located, to determine how the building is put together. Next, the blaster crew tours the building (several times), jotting down notes about the support structure on each floor. Once they have gathered all the raw data they need, the blasters hammer out a plan of attack. Drawing from past experiences with similar buildings, they decide what explosives to use, where to position them in the building and how to time their detonations. In some cases, the blasters may develop 3-D computer models of the structure so they can test out their plan ahead of time in a virtual world.

Clearly, the explosives were already in place, and he wanted to bring down the building in order to cash in on his $500 million insurance plan.

As I have shown before, he even said it himself, that he had made the decision to "pull" the building:



Watch as these fireman predict the collapse of WTC 7:



Do you ever wonder what happened to WTCs 3-6? They suffered far worse damage than 7, and did not collapse.

Click on the picture to enlarge it.

WTC 3:


WTC 4:


WTC 5:


WTC 6:


BBC even reported on the collapse of building 7 20 minutes before it happened!



I'm going to conclude this post with Aaron Russo's interview by Alex Jones (which I've posted before, here). Russo talked to Nick Rockefeller himself about the New World Order.



Feel free to comment.

This Prison Planet article helped a lot in this post.

Dr. Kevorkian

I am sure most of you have heard of Dr. Kevorkian, also known as "Dr. Death". He is the man behind "physician-assisted suicide", claiming to have assisted at least 130 patients in ending their lives. He was in prison between 1999 and 2007 after being convicted of second-degree murder.

I saw him being interviewed on CNN, and decided to look for videos of him on youtube. I stumbled on a segment of his speech at Nova Southeastern University. In it, he talks about where America is heading. I couldn't agree with him more (except for when he says "under God" should not be in the pledge of allegiance, at the very beginning of the video).

It's hard to hear at parts due to people talking, but the overall point is clear.

The Lord's Prayer

After two extremely depressing posts tonight, here is a beacon of hope:

10 Remarkble 9/11 Truths

After posting that Iraq war video I have decided to post about what led us into that war, and the whole "war on terrorism": 9/11. I've posted once before about this. Here are 10 remarkable facts from that day, with help from an Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth dvd I have.

1. WTC 7. Have you heard of the third building that fell on 9/11? WTC 7 is a 47 story, steel framed skyscraper located a block away from the twin towers. It was never hit by a plane, but collapsed at 5:20 pm imploding exactly the way controlled demolitions do. It fell suddenly, straight down, near free fall speed, without damaging the surrounding building much. Amazingly, there is no mention of the collapse of WTC 7 in the 571-page 9/11 Commission Report.





Larry Silverstein gained billions from the collapse of that building with insurance. He tried to explain what he meant by "pull" after the video, saying he meant to pull the firefighters out of the building to safety. You be the judge.

2. Fire. Fire has never, before or after 9/11, caused a steel framed building to collapse.



3. Steel. The steel from the buildings could have been examined, but it was shipped overseas and melted down immediately after September 11th. This was an unprecedented violation of federal crime scene laws.

4. Fighter Jets. Fighter jets routinely take to the air to investigate whenever contact is lost with any airplane. This occurs about 100 times per year in well under 20 minutes. On 9/11, nearly 2 hours passed without any interceptions.

5. Secret Service. The secret service broke established protocols by allowing President bush to remain in a well-publicized classroom long after it was known the US was under attack.

6. Money. Unidentified insiders made millions on the stocks of American and United Airlines and those of other corporations that were also impacted by the attacks. These "put option" bets were made just before 9/11.

7. Warnings. At least 11 other countries warned of the impending attack. Also, before 9/11 John Ashcroft, top military officers, and San Francisco mayor Willie Brown received warnings not to fly.

8. New Pearl Harbor. In September 2000, a group of neocon war hawks, many of whom became key officials in the bush administration, wrote that their proposed massive military buildup would proceed slowly without "some catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a new Pearl Harbor".

9. Hijackers. Some of the alleged hijackers from 9/11 are still alive and well, according to BBC and The Guardian.

10. The Jersey Girls. "The Jersey Girls", four 9/11 widowers, finally forced the 9/11 commission into existence and presented many questions, most of which were ignored. The final report failed to address any of the evidence pointing to official complicity.

Massacre in Iraq

This video is highly, highly disturbing. American soldiers fire at and kill a group of Iraqis based on the possibility that they are armed. There is no solid proof that they are, and they seem to be completely relaxed and not suspicious. It's a sickening video, but it has to be seen to understand the reality of what is happening overseas.

The video surfaced on Monday on WikiLeaks: Collateral Murder



Here is a link to an article about it: YGLESIAS

Here is a wikipedia page on casualties of the Iraq War: Wikipedia

EDIT: Here is Alex Jones talking about the video above as well as others showing American soldiers killing innocent civilians.



Via this Prison Planet article.

Still Here

This blog is NOT dead. I will be posting in about a week, after this nice spring break.

UK Anti-Terrorism Ad

Just listen to this advertisement from the UK. Sounds like a 1984 book-on-tape.



Found via Prison Planet.

Jesse Ventura and 9/11 Truth

This morning Jesse Ventura, former governor of Minnesota, wrote a piece on 9/11 on the front page of The Huffington Post. It has since completely disappeared. What is left is here. Evidently the Huffington Post can run stories on other conspiracy theories, such as the war on drugs, but not 9/11.

Let's not forget that the "accepted" story of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory itself, claiming that some terrorists got together and conspired to fly planes into the World Trade Center.

Here is Jesse Ventura's piece (via this Prison Planet Article):

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 11TH?

You didn’t see anything about it in the mainstream media, but two weeks ago at a conference in San Francisco, more than one thousand architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.

That’s right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy – because they don’t buy the government’s version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible – or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7.

Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, put it like this: “The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction.” He’s especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 447 stories came down in “pure free-fall acceleration” that afternoon – even though it was never hit by an aircraft.

This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies , published this week by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows:

Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9/11 were going 440 and 550 miles an hour.

Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don’t claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy’s underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a “gravity driven collapse” without demolition charges defies the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately ten seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there’s the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) started its investigation on August 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Steven E. Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn’t have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9/11, with Governor Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn’t mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We’re talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal , in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here’s what the paper’s lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen’s chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he’s convinced brought down the Twin Towers and the nearby Building 7:

“Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust-powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2500 degrees Centigrade. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel.” [i]

Richard Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: “Once you get to the science, it’s indisputable.”

___________________________________________________________________

Here is the collapse of WTC 7 that Jesse refers to:



This building was NOT hit by a plane.

The 1000 Architects and Engineers he refers to are from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

This is an appearance by Jesse on Fox on May 19th, 2009 in which he discusses 9/11 with one very angry and unreasonable person and two other cool-headed listeners:

William Cooper

William Cooper served in the US Air Force and Navy. During his time in the Navy, when he was a member of the Intelligence Briefing Team of the Commander in Chief of the United States Pacific Fleet, he saw top secret documents under the name "MAJESTYTWELVE". He describes in detail what he saw in the document and the implications it has on the world, here. Read the whole thing. The documents he saw dealt with the creation of the New World Order.

"The plan outlined the formation of a world totalitarian socialist government. It is to be ruled by a behind-the-scenes council of wise men. A so-called benevolent dictator, will be presented as the Messiah.

"The Constitution for the united States of America and its Bill of Rights will be scrapped. A parliamentary form of government will take its place. All military forces and individuals are to be disarmed except for an internal police force which will carry only the minimum weapons needed to maintain internal order."

That was one small excerpt of his text.

Cooper was the first on September 11th in so many ways. He was the first to question the collapse of the twin towers, saying there was no way they could have fallen without explosives. He was also the first to say that the aftermath of 9/11 would be a redefinition of freedom. He predicted the loss of rights, and knew that it was another step toward world totalitarian government. The youtube video of his radio broadcast on that day is here.

Bill Cooper tragically and suspiciously was shot and killed by the police outside his home on November 5th, 2001, not even two months after 9/11.

Ron Paul at CPAC

This is a very beautiful and powerful speech by Ron Paul at the Conservative Political Action Conference to a packed house.

Global Warming

One of the biggest frauds in my lifetime is that of global warming. The nonexistent impact of humans on the environment was, and still is, hammered down over and over by the mainstream media until it simply becomes an accepted truth. This causes a collective fear to build. People want to know what the problem is and how it can be fixed. That's when the word "overpopulation" shows its ugly face. Humanity, rather than being a beautiful thing to be celebrated, becomes a cancer on the planet. The "warming" of the planet is blamed on carbon, the second most abundant element in the human body, after oxygen.

"Eugenic goals are most likely to be achieved under another name than eugenics." This is a quote by Frederick Osborn, author of Preface to Eugenics, and the first president of the Population Council, started by John D. Rockefeller the 3rd.

The Copenhagen Treaty was perfect to the New World Order. It would have created a world government to enforce international taxes. The constitution would have been no match to the proposed world government. Too bad it didn't work. Why didn't it? Because just days before the conference thousands of emails and other documents from Britain’s East Anglia Climate Research Unit were leaked onto the internet. These documents showed suppression of information and scrapping of temperature data in order to make it seem that the temperature around the world was increasing and that we were all going to die unless we accepted new taxes, a new world government, and anything else that "needed" to be done in order to save the planet. This is Climategate.

Climategate is NOT the only climate scandal. Read this article for a summary of every embarrassment the IPCC and others have had to deal with: Guide to the Climate Scandals

Here's an article about Professor Phil Jones. This guy was a key climatologist, that is until his emails were shown to the world in which he talked about a "trick" to "hide the decline" of the temperatures.

"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."

His data backing the famous "hockey stick graph" has gone missing, according to him. He also admits that there has been no warming since 1995 and that the temperature of the planet may have actually been hotter during the medieval period.

Here are some more Climategate emails:

Michael Mann:

"Perhaps we'll do a simple update to the Yamal post, e.g. linking Keith/s new page--Gavin t? As to the issues of robustness, particularly w.r.t. inclusion of the Yamal series, we actually emphasized that (including the Osborn and Briffa '06 sensitivity test) in our original post! As we all know, this isn't about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations."

Phil Jones again:

"The skeptics seem to be building up a head of steam here! ... The IPCC comes in for a lot of stick. Leave it to you to delete as appropriate! Cheers Phil
PS I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act !"

You can read a lot more emails here.

“Sail on oh ship of state, sail on oh union, strong and great. Humanity with all its fears, with all the hopes of future years, is hanging breathless on thy fate.”

--Longfellow