After reading the Executive Summary of this "Special Climate Change Program 2009-2012 Mexico" that is taking place November 29th to December 10th here, here are some excerpts:
"Tackling climate change requires the immediate development of activities that reduce greenhouse gas emissions... The effectiveness of these activities increases significantly when various sectors converge in a cross-cutting mainstream policy strategy."
So we are supposed to want a mainstream, cross-cutting policy strategy... I bet a one-world policy is ideal. And the policy is supposed to reduce greenhouse gases.
"Recently, several groups of experts in the scientific, economic, and social aspects of climate change have raised the possibility that the risks posed are significantly more severe than outlined in previous estimates, such that current mitigation strategies are likely to need updating in the short term."
So climate change is bad, and we need to do something about it soon.
"Mexico's aspirational target," the target of lower greenhouse gas emissions, "will only be met if a multilateral regime," or an authoritarian government consisting of governments from various countries, aka a one world government, "is established which includes financial and technological support mechanisms from developed countries on an unprecedented scale."
So countries have to come together and form a one-world government in a new world order in order to lower their respective greenhouse gas emissions.
"The mitigation effort that Mexico intends to develop requires deep transformations in production and consumption patterns, energy use, natural resource management, and in the ways that land is occupied and used."
These sound like extreme changes. The only condition in which these changes should be made is if climate change is proven beyond any doubt. This is not the case.
"Strengthening strategic, large-scale adaption capacities from 2013 to 2030, includes as priorities... The implementation of relocation programs for human settlements and infrastructure in high risk areas."
So they plan on forcing people to relocate. The climate change fraud could lead to complete control over us.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I heard comedian Arj Barker make a surprisingly independent statement on his comedy central special (surprising because he works for HBO) saying, "I don't blame the bread when it burns in the toaster. Has anyone considered the sun is getting hotter?"
ReplyDeleteThis whole CO2 issue is comical, when you see how many trees are being cut down every day. They have done a great job side-tracking the general public from the true problem of carcinogens in the air and water.