This post is to serve as a staring point to all of the information I want to share.
This "new world order" that they speak of sounds nice, with phrases like "the rule of law" and "peacekeeping role" and "diverse nations are drawn together in a common cause", but make no mistake it will be the end of all freedom and all individualism. It is a collectivist system, like the one in China.
Read "1984" by George Orwell to get a very accurate idea of how the world will be should the new world order be realized.
A pretty good summary of the NWO is given by Dr. John Coleman in "Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300":
"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.
There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."
However I disagree with one point: I think the people behind the NWO want less than 1 billion people as the world's total population. Look at the very first "guideline" engraved on the Georgia Guidestones:
"1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."
The guidestones basically hold the ten commandments of the NWO. Here is its Wikipedia page.
The "one-unit monetary system" is on its way. Here is Glenn Beck after the bailout. Yes, its a relatively older video (2008), but it is obviously still relevant.
If the value of the dollar keeps decreasing and our national debt keeps increasing, the dollar will collapse and the new world currency will be put into place. For more about the dying dollar, watch the Ron Paul state of the union videos I posted earlier.
The death of the dollar, the increasing government controls over the internet, the giving up of freedoms out of terrorism fears, the controls over our education and the mainstream media; all of these are leading to the new world order. We can still stop it, but more people have to wake up and see the truth.
This final video sums it all up pretty clearly. Aaron Russo, after learning from Nick Rockefeller about the "war on terror" and the goals of the NWO, gets interviewed by Alex Jones. Russo died of cancer the same year, a few months after this:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ryan,
ReplyDeleteFirst off, there wasn't a "New World Order" in 1984. There were three separate countries that were in perpetual war with each other (however, it is possible that the "image" of 3 countries was a hoax perpetrated by the gov't of Oceania). However, 1984 is a very good depiction of a "police state" where Big Brother controls all aspects of your life.
Anyways, I'm bothered that you are posting things that are flat out crazy conspiracies. A few years back, I watched the 2-hour internet documentary "Loose Change" that provided the basis for all of these 9/11 conspiracies. They also spoke of how the whole thing was financed and supported by the "elite" in our own country. The video shocked me.
However, Popular Mechanics went and "debunked" many of these myths in a TV special; the written report can be found here: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
I remember watching this special and laughing my ass off as a bunch of engineers debunked all of these myths that were suggested by a bunch of dumb college-know-it-all hippies.
This Aaron Russo guy is an idiot. If he was alive, would he be calling the Christmas underwear bomber a hoax as well? It's an insult to the people who have been affected by terrorist attacks and their families.
I'm not saying Afghanistan/Iraq was justified. What I am saying is that while conspiracies are fun to talk about, they are all a load of bullshit.
I will grant you one very important thing though: Freedoms and privacies are definitely at risk with the advent of recent advances in technology. It's going to take people like you and me to stand up for our personal rights and make sure the bill of rights are upheld.
Are we to the point of a NWO? No. Could it get to that point in a few hundred years if our commitment to freedom is abandoned? Yes. However, we should focus on relevant domestic issues (i.e. Bush wiretapping, etc.) instead of worrying about crazy things like international conspiracies.
1984 is simply a book that depicts what life can be like if people don't wake up, in that there is Newspeak, thought crimes, the "Goldstein" villain that parallels Osama Bin Laden, kids turning in their parents, etc. The only reason I included that in this post was to give people an idea of what is happening around us. It was not by any means the main point of this post.
ReplyDeleteThis is NOT a "crazy conspiracy theory", but I was completely prepared for it to be called one, because we are conditioned to think that anyone who questions the War on Terror and/or 9/11 is a "conspiracy theorist" and therefore should be given pills rather than taken seriously. The word "conspiracy" itself has become a word that immediately stops a conversation and shuts down all serious thought.
"Loose Change", in my opinion is a good documentary but if you don't believe it due to the credibility of the makers of the film, there are far more credible sources to look to, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I do plan on posting about 9/11. I can't get into all of the evidence against Popular Mechanics and against the "911 Commission Report" right now because there is so much, but I will write a post on it.
The "underwear bomber" could have been a set up as well. I have already posted a video of one witness, a lawyer, who claims he saw a "well dressed man" lobbying to get the bomber onto the plane without a passport.
Why is Aaron Russo an idiot? He was a very smart man who has pictures taken with the Rockefellers thereby making him a completely credible witness.
Some conspiracies, you're right, are complete bull, such as UFO's or lizard people running the world. But there are also conspiracies backed with a lot of facts that should not be cast down simply because they are conspiracies.
Aaron Russo's comments regarding Rockefeller are hearsay. There's a reason that such comments are generally inadmissible in the court-of-law.
ReplyDeleteLook, I'm all for questioning the government and all that. At one point, I slightly believed this 911 conspiracy stuff and take it seriously. It's hard to take something serious, however, when engineers and scientists come along and disprove it all. Again, "Loose Change" was made by collegiate filmmakers, not scientists and engineers.
I'm not knocking the 9/11 conspiracies because the word "conspiracy" carries so much negative connotation. I'm rejecting its arguments because they were all disproven by SCIENCE.
Maybe the "well dressed man" was an innocent bystander who wanted to help the bomber out. Motive? Maybe the well dressed man is a traveler who always has trouble getting through customs and had a soft spot for a fellow traveler. My point is that speculating this stuff is endless and pointless.
Remember, you're a civil engineer. Go with the science, go with the facts. If certain facts don't match up, consider reasonable alternatives instead of the more far-fetched ones.
First of all I'm glad that we are talking about this because so many people our age simply don't care; they are too busy watching Jersey Shore or something.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you that we have to question the science of 9/11. But when you look at that day, the laws of physics were non existent. Building 7 fell at freefall speed with acceleration due to gravity. It feel (as did the other two towers) in the direction of most resistance. How did they fall? According to the official report they fell due to fire. No building in history has ever fallen due to fire, except for the 3 that fell on 9/11.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13049
Look at that link. Thermite was found in the dust of the towers. Thermite is used in demolishing buildings. How could it have got in the towers? Who put it there? These are scientists who discovered the thermite, not collegiate filmmakers.
Also, over 1,000 scientists and engineers have signed a petition demanding a reinvestigation into 9/11. Here is the link to that:
http://www.ae911truth.org/
There is a lot of science going against the popular belief that the buildings fell due to fire. Steel's melting point is higher than the highest temperature of burning jet fuel.
I'll go deeper into this in another post.
Related to steel's melting point, an excerpt from the Popular Mechanics article:
ReplyDelete"Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength — and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.
"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down." "
As for the thermite, that's the first I have heard of this and the Popular Mechanics article did not mention it.
Anyhow, you claimed that "the laws of physics were non existent." Read that article: they account for many (if not all) of the "false physics" that many 9/11 conspirators point to.
And yeah, I'm glad we can talk about this stuff. And yeah, Jersey Shore is an awful show. Just when you think MTV can't get any trashier...